 |
|
|
| | Author | Message |
|---|
T2O AcEoFWaR
LEADER
Posts : 374
Points : 531
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2009-05-29
Age : 30
Location : tt house
 | | Subject: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 6:55 am | |
| Round1:T2O WoN 3 - 1  Round2:T2O WoN 3 - 0  PCE |
|   | | xSuRViVaLx-xX[Keewee]
PRIVATE
![xSuRViVaLx-xX[Keewee]](https://2img.net/h/i922.photobucket.com/albums/ad67/zachhellraiser44/zerk16avatar.gif)
Posts : 64
Points : 73
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-07-18
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 9:14 am | |
| as you can see both rounds dey wer neg lol |
| | | | T2O Sn0wM4n
CO-LEADER
Posts : 341
Points : 378
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 27
Location : Somplace nice XD
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 9:53 am | |
| |
| | | | Hunt3r 4L
Posts : 280
Points : 334
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2009-10-25
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 11:40 am | |
| It was quite clear that the only thing they did was go middle. Way too easy. Their only cap was the first of the game because we expected them to be absolutely terrible. Truth of the matter is, they are only on about the same level as a bad WC. |
| | | | GoDKiLL4
Posts : 731
Points : 725
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2009-02-01
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 5:22 pm | |
| lmao dat wuz bad.. i thruly expected way more 4 people hu talks like dat lmao |
| | | | [T2O] XpLoSiOnZ
![[T2O] XpLoSiOnZ](https://2img.net/u/3413/68/55/77/avatars/89-56.jpg)
Posts : 680
Points : 806
Reputation : -1
Join date : 2009-03-29
Age : 29
Location : Ohio : FTB's Finest
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 7:51 pm | |
| lmfao the fags got merked |
| | | | T2O RAiN
Posts : 631
Points : 681
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2009-03-02
Age : 32
Location : NY
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 8:28 pm | |
| Yeah we owned them but I'm sure the same would've happened to us if we warred them on mohh1. |
| | | | Soap
Posts : 276
Points : 313
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-03-14
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Fri 12 Feb 2010, 8:42 pm | |
| - T2O RAiN wrote:
- Yeah we owned them but I'm sure the same would've happened to us if we warred them on mohh1.
Nope.  |
| | | | RiiSeN 1
Posts : 7
Points : 9
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-02-10
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM Sat 13 Feb 2010, 10:51 pm | |
| lol. first war and second day playing |
| | | | Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: T2O vs NAM | |
| |
| | | | |
| Page 1 of 1 | |
| | Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|
